This paper was written without using the following word(assuming I didn't miss any instances): is, am, are, was, were, be, been, it, thing, get, gets, got, gots, goes
The highlighted words are weaved and connecting sentences(or at least supposed to)
So without further a do(mind the error in transition around the middle, that is not supposed to be highlighted):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sailor’s Integral Command
Ascribing a concrete integral definition to sailing presents an
enigma. Sailing
encompasses an ancient skill
that spans back to some of the earliest men. That very skill, born out of navigation needs of the time
and evolved
accordingly. The skill and my love for the subject evolve far too broadly to ascribe solid concepts. Sailing bears
little evolution of concept,
historically amid
growing technology. The practice has fundamentally remained unchanged
throughout the historical
lifespan, other than advancements in knowledge of mechanics.
Sailing knowledgably would come about pegged by most as a hobby being that
not many professional
options for employment exist. This notion further informed by professional organizations
such as the Heart of sailing foundation which
spends time informing
others about sailing and such respective merits. Magazines such as Sail Magazine, including at times National Geographic also do quite a bit inform readers.
An object or idea being said to posses
integrity or appear integral
implies necessity. The integrity
or integral parts of modern computer hardware for example partake the following
subjects: mathematics
relating to geometric concepts and arithmetic’s, and sciences relating to
hardware material. Whatever the subject, integrity presents success or failure relating to the “big picture”.
Imagine trying to attempt successful
medicinal tasks
without the fields of biology or sister fields. The task would appear daunting, even if standard. No one picks
and chooses; standards
being the reason. Many reasonably backed fields navigate as such.
The
integral structure of sailing and practice go hand in hand. Professional’s
community website A-B-C of Sailing suggests:
“Navigation seems to be a complicated subject, but you just need to
understand the basics.” Recommendations would follow a miniscule complication path; such
as the knowledge of terms,
navigation tools, beacons and buoyancy devices, and pilotage. While true that
these appear as standard terms
within the field, at the same time one has difficulty. The wind for example, appears necessary
if you plan to go sailing, but remains difficult to master.
The Yachting organization of Western
Australia approaches hands on fundamental to mastery with the fields of: rigging, practice sessions, close
hauling, how to jibe, and towing procedures. These two sites slowly introduce a
universal “practice
makes perfect” method.
These methods
remain mandatory.
Without this mandate,
one cannot sail. To sail reveals a single universal. That universal appears as adaptation. Adaptations do not mold the concept nor skill,
but the practitioner.
Such molding of the sailor while sailing hopefully leads into integral consistency. Not all
conditions in sailing become consistent
with expectation.
Thus nothing presents a situation expectantly to similarly reflect past experience. Instead, experiences should serve as a tool for the future. Many can demand from
many futures, but few
shall receive. Although
receiving appears
great, that signals no reason to stagnate.
I hope to refute stagnation and push only for growth. The path of growing largely does
present opportunities for abstract
application. These abstract
lessons include what I someday hope will teach me lessons far beyond the reach of a boat. Teaching ensures the passing
of such knowledge towards forward disciples who may yet utilize these concepts
in ways I could not.
